Re: Why do we have or should have keep-alive packets?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ah, yes. Well I'm happy to write a one-page draft that modifies DCCP this way, or to reword it.

Eddie


Lars Eggert wrote:
On 2007-3-28, at 9:40, ext Eddie Kohler wrote:
I think we made a mistake in DCCP when we said that the API SHOULD report zero-length packets to the receiving application. (I think Greg Minshall warned us this was a bad choice, too!) The Faster Restart draft therefore modifies this behavior.

On a purely procedural note: faster-restart cannot modify the overall DCCP API in this way, because it is going for Experimental and hence can't update a PS.

Lars




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Linux DCCP]     [IETF Annouce]     [Linux Networking]     [Git]     [Security]     [Linux Assembly]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [DDR & Rambus]

  Powered by Linux