Re: TFRC minrate calculation after idle or datalimited period

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




TFRC.bis is a maintainance version of TFRC, to correct the TFRC specification and will obsolete it when published. The stated milestone date is July 2007 - my notes show this is currently pending inputs from implementors (please do contribute to this within the WG).

As such, any current work that will be published after TFRC.bis MUST refer to TFRC.bis, and it would certainly be wise to consider this as the basis for all DCCP I-Ds.

However, DCCP CCID currently relies on RFC3448 (TFRC). As I see it, section 3.1 states how this dependency should be managed. I am not clear from reading this how an update of the TFRC base spec needs to be treated, is that what you are asking? I note that there are other issues that also need to be addressed in CCID-3.

Gorry

Eddie Kohler wrote:

I hope Sally and/or Mark speak up here. I'm not sure whether RFC3448bis is considered in its early stages, or should be implemented right away, or what....

Eddie


Arjuna Sathiaseelan wrote:

Eddie:
Ok I get it now..My entire arguments (hence the confusion )were based
on RFC3448-bis and not RFC3448...I was raising points from the
RFC3448-bis draft under the presumption that this draft obsoletes
rfc3448 when it comes to implementing in ns-2..

Arjuna



<snip>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Linux DCCP]     [IETF Annouce]     [Linux Networking]     [Git]     [Security]     [Linux Assembly]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [DDR & Rambus]

  Powered by Linux