On Oct 5, 2006, at 10:07, Gorry Fairhurst wrote:
A reminer that the WGLC is currently on-going - anyone interested in this I-D is welcome to send questions and requests for clarification within the WGLC period.
Sorry for being a bit late, but these are all nits anyway. Lars INTRODUCTION, paragraph 10: > is designed for applications that send small packets. The design > goal for TFRC-SP is to achieve the same bandwidth in bps as a TCP > flow using packets of up to 1500 bytes. TFRC-SP enforces a Min > Interval of 10 ms between data packets, to prevent a single flow > from sending small packets arbitrarily frequently. Nit: Maybe expand bps and Min Interval. Section 2., paragraph 9: > 6.3.1 of RFC 3448 specifies that the TFRC receiver initialize the > loss history after the first loss event by calculating the loss Nit: s/initialize/initializes/ Section 4.1., paragraph 7: > This equation uses an RTO of $4R$, and assumes that the TCP Nit: s/$4R$/4*R/ Section 4.1., paragraph 12: > Table 1: Response Function for TCP and TFRC. > Sending Rate in KBps, as a Function of Packet Drop Rate. KBps or Kbps? (also elsewhere in the document) Section 4.1., paragraph 15:> The calculations for Tables 1 and 2 use the packet loss rate for an > approximation for the loss event rate p. (The scripts for producing
> these tables are available at> "http://www.icir.org/tfrc/voipsims.html". There is also a pointer > to the document "Graphs for draft-ietf-dccp-tfrc-voip-05", which has
> graphs for the tables in this document.) URL was down when I tried. Also, might want to move this into a reference? Section 4.1., paragraph 15: > TFRC-SP flow usinsg the same sending rate in KBps as the TCP flow Nit: s/usinsg/using/ Section 5., paragraph 2: > sending rate of 64 kbps would be required to terminate or suspend Nit: s/kbps/Kbps/ Section 7., paragraph 0: > 7. Simulation Results Suggest to move this section to an appendix, is tangential to the description/discussion of the mechanism itself. Section 12., paragraph 19:> [RFC 2434] T. Narten and H. Alvestrand. Guidelines for Writing an
> IANA Considerations Section in RFCs. RFC 2434. Unused Reference: 'RFC 2434' is defined on line 1704, but not referenced -- Lars Eggert NEC Network Laboratories
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature