Re: Query about draft RFC 3448-bis-00

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ok I guess its the first feedback packet caused by the first packet
sent after the nofeedback timer. Looks fine :)..

-Arjuna

On 8/18/06, Arjuna Sathiaseelan <arjuna.sathiaseelan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dear All,
 Was going throught the draft rfc-3448-bis-00. I was wondering how
does the sender increase the rate after the first feedback packet
after a nofeedback timer based on the following algorithm?

"If (sender has been idle or data-limited)
                min_rate = max(2*X_recv, W_init/R);
            Else
                min_rate = 2*X_recv;
            If (p > 0)
                Calculate X_calc using the TCP throughput equation.
                X = max(min(X_calc, min_rate), s/t_mbi);
            Else if (not the first feedback packet, and
              not the first feedback packet after a nofeedback timer)
                If (t_now - tld >= R)
                    X = max(min(2*X, min_rate), s/R);
                    tld = t_now; "

Any suggestions please?


--
Regards,
Arjuna

Postdoctoral Researcher
Engineering Research Lab,
Department of Engineering,
University of Aberdeen



--
Regards,
Arjuna

Postdoctoral Researcher
Engineering Research Lab,
Department of Engineering,
University of Aberdeen


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Linux DCCP]     [IETF Annouce]     [Linux Networking]     [Git]     [Security]     [Linux Assembly]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [DDR & Rambus]

  Powered by Linux