Dear Lars, The paper is very good :)..I just had a few questions: 1)Does the packet loss rate consider the loss of packets due to the improper synchronization of the application encoding rate and TFRC-SP's sending rate after silence periods or is it due to loss of packets due to congestion only? If you hadnt used dummy packets during the initial slowstart, then I guess you would have got a large packet loss rate! :).. 2)"This is surprising,because TFRC SP is allowed to inject as many small packets in the network as desired," I am not sure if this statement is right? I guess it has some upper limit (100 packets)? Correct me if I am wrong.. Some points: * I guess some improvement would be there - since the receiver rate after idle period has been currently sorted out. * With larger delays, the quality of voice is too bad and this is worrying! Regds Arjuna On 8/2/06, Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi, we finally have the results of our voice quality experiments over DCCP written up: http://larseggert.de/tmp/2006-dccp-voip-quality.pdf We'd appreciate any feedback you may have on this! Thanks, Lars -- Lars Eggert NEC Network Laboratories
-- Regards, Arjuna Postdoctoral Researcher Engineering Research Lab, Department of Engineering, University of Aberdeen
