Re: Re: faster restart updates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Arjuna Sathiaseelan wrote:
Any idea on how comfort noise packets could be used instead of ping
packets to solve this problem?

Hi,

I don't think comfort noise packets are the solution to this problem. For many codec they have a fixed period, for example AMR sends one silence descriptor packet every 8th frame, i.e. every 160 ms. Thus this may remove the need for ping as long as the RTT stays in certain bounds. However there is clearly cases where the RTT is so short that it would not fulfill a goal of having a ping no less often than every 4th RTT. One should also consider other traffic that may have characteristic that makes it desirable to use faster restart but lacks comfort noise to send.

cheers

Magnus Westerlund

Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVA/A
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ericsson AB                | Phone +46 8 4048287
Torshamsgatan 23           | Fax   +46 8 7575550
S-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: magnus.westerlund@xxxxxxxxxxxx


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Linux DCCP]     [IETF Annouce]     [Linux Networking]     [Git]     [Security]     [Linux Assembly]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [DDR & Rambus]

  Powered by Linux