A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. BCP 201 RFC 7696 Title: Guidelines for Cryptographic Algorithm Agility and Selecting Mandatory-to-Implement Algorithms Author: R. Housley Status: Best Current Practice Stream: IETF Date: November 2015 Mailbox: housley@vigilsec.com Pages: 19 Characters: 50543 See Also: BCP 201 I-D Tag: draft-iab-crypto-alg-agility-08.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7696 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17487/RFC7696 Many IETF protocols use cryptographic algorithms to provide confidentiality, integrity, authentication, or digital signature. Communicating peers must support a common set of cryptographic algorithms for these mechanisms to work properly. This memo provides guidelines to ensure that protocols have the ability to migrate from one mandatory- to-implement algorithm suite to another over time. BCP: This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC