The IESG has approved the following document: - 'Session Peering Provisioning Framework (SPPF)' (draft-ietf-drinks-spp-framework-12.txt) as Proposed Standard This document is the product of the Data for Reachability of Inter/tra-NetworK SIP Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Barry Leiba, Ben Campbell and Alissa Cooper. A URL of this Internet Draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-drinks-spp-framework/ Technical Summary: This document specifies the data model and the overall structure for a framework to provision session establishment data into Session Data Registries and SIP Service Provider data stores. The framework is called the Session Peering Provisioning Framework (SPPF). The provisioned data is typically used by network elements for session establishment. Working Group Summary: Given the small size of the working group, particularly towards the end of the document creation process, most of the active WG participants were also part of the Design Team. All issues were discussed extensively in the Design Team to achieve strong consensus. Since the design team represented a vast majority of the active WG participants, the shepherd believes that there is strong concensus by the WG behind the documents. During the design process a complete restructuring of the set of documents was performed, in order for the protocol to become transfer- agnostic. Specifically, this was in consideration of an additional future REST-based transport specification. Document Quality: A prototype-level implementation was performed by WG participants, involving programmers who were not involved in the protocol specification. Lessons learned from that implementation were fed back into the protocol specification. Furthermore, the Design Team that created the documents included several potential implementers with concrete plans to use the protocol in their networks. The design team was in substantive favour of using SOAP as transfer protocol, since this is what target networks currently use for provisioning. However, due to concerns brought to the attention of the group from within as well as outside the working group, significant efforts were undertaken to segregate core (â??frameworkâ??) definitions from the actual transport definition, and hence allow ing for the future definitions of other transport protocols. Personnel: Alexander Mayrhofer serves as the Document Shepherd, and Ben Campbell serves as the responsible AD. RFC Editor Note Please update the title of section 4: OLD: 4. Transport Substrate Protocol Requirements NEW: 4. Substrate Protocol Requirements END