The IESG has approved the following document: - 'The Accumulated IGP Metric Attribute for BGP' (draft-ietf-idr-aigp-18.txt) as Proposed Standard This document is the product of the Inter-Domain Routing Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Alia Atlas and Adrian Farrel. A URL of this Internet Draft is: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-aigp/ Technical Summary Routing protocols that have been designed to run within a single administrative domain ("IGPs") generally do so by assigning a metric to each link, and then choosing as the installed path between two nodes the path for which the total distance (sum of the metric of each link along the path) is minimized. BGP, designed to provide routing over a large number of independent administrative domains ("autonomous systems"), does not make its path selection decisions through the use of a metric. It is generally recognized that any attempt to do so would incur significant scalability problems, as well as inter-administration coordination problems. However, there are deployments in which a single administration runs several contiguous BGP networks. In such cases, it can be desirable, within that single administrative domain, for BGP to select paths based on a metric, just as an IGP would do. The purpose of this document is to provide a specification for doing so. Working Group Summary The working actively reviewed this draft considering the following: a) error handling with malformed packets or malformed transitive bits, b) placement of AIGP TLV in the draft; c) default setting for AIGP_SESSION on IBGP setting at SHOULD be "enabled" (AIGP_SESSION aids flagging the AIGP packets exiting the restricted environment to the wild), d) AIGP value is capped at maximum. This value cannot wrap, and any attempts to increase it past its maximum is treated as a malformed packet, and e) TLV formatting.. Document Quality This WG draft has been implemented by 3 vendors (including Juniper and Cisco), and seen deployment in ISPs. The debates around this draft have been resolved by the authors by the -14 draft. Shepherd did editorial pass on the draft, and the authors address the nits that shepherd found. Reviewers on the list were interested and complete in their review. The reviewers on the IDR list included long-time experts, newer implementers, deployment and research. While additional review is always good, this was a good review. IPR LC was done based on two disclosures from cisco: id #1159, #1160. No concerns were raised. Reviews done: Early OPS-IDR review by Ron Bonica resulted in several changes, and Ron Bonica approving the document. An Early IANA Review also resulted in changes. No comments were received from an early request for a Routing Directorate review. No MIB Doctor review is relevant for this review outside an OPS-DIR review. Personnel Shepherd: Susan Hares (WG chair) WG chairs: John Scudder and Susan Hares AD: Alia Atlas
