The Path Computation Element (pce) working group in the Routing Area of the IETF has been rechartered. For additional information please contact the Area Directors or the WG Chairs. Path Computation Element (pce) ------------------------------------------------ Current Status: Active Working Group Chairs: JP Vasseur <jpv@cisco.com> Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com> Secretaries: Daniel King <daniel@olddog.co.uk> Assigned Area Director: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Mailing list Address: pce@ietf.org To Subscribe: http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce Archive: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pce/ Charter of Working Group: The PCE Working Group is chartered to specify the required protocols so as to enable a Path Computation Element (PCE)-based architecture for the computation of paths for MPLS and GMPLS Point to Point and Point to Multi-point Traffic Engineered LSPs. In this architecture path computation does not necessarily occur on the head-end (ingress) LSR, but on some other path computation entity that may physically not be located on each head-end LSR. The PCE WG works on application of this model within a single domain or within a group of domains (where a domain is a layer, IGP area or Autonomous System with limited visibility from the head-end LSR). At this time, applying this model to large groups of domains such as the Internet is not thought to be possible, and the PCE WG will not spend energy on that topic. The WG specifies the PCE communication Protocol (PCEP) and needed extensions for communication between LSRs (termed Path Computation Clients - PCCs) and PCEs, and between cooperating PCEs. Security mechanisms such as authentication and confidentiality are included. The WG determines requirements for extensions to existing routing and signaling protocols in support of the PCE architecture and the signaling of inter-domain paths (e.g. RSVP-TE and its GMPLS variations). Any necessary extensions will be produced in collaboration with the Working Groups responsible for the protocols. The WG also works on the mechanisms to for multi-layer path computation and PCEP extensions for communication between several network layers. The WG defines the required PCEP extensions for Wavelength Switched Optical Networks (WSON) while keeping consistency with the GMPLS architecture specified in the CCAMP WG. Work Items: - PCEP extensions for MPLS and GMPLS Traffic Engineered LSP path computation models involving PCE(s). This includes the case of computing the paths of intra and inter-domain TE LSPs. Such path computation includes the generation of primary, protection and recovery paths, as well as computations for (local/global) reoptimization and load balancing. Both intra- and inter-domain applications are covered. - In cooperation with protocol specific Working Group (e.g., MPLS, CCAMP), development of LSP signaling (RSVP-TE) extensions required to support PCE-based path computation models. - Specification of PCEP extensions for communication in the various GMPLS-controlled networks, including WSON. - Definition of PCEP extensions for path computation in multi-layer networks. - Definition of the PCEP extensions used by a stateful PCE for recommending a new path for an existing or new LSP to the PCC/PCE. Further protocol extensions must cover the case where the recommendation is not followed by the PCC/PCE. Milestones: Done - Submit first draft of PCE architecture document Done - Submit first draft of PCE discovery requirements and protocol extensions documents Done - Submit first draft of the PCE communication protocol requirements Done - Submit first draft of the definition of objective metrics Done - Submit first draft of the PCE communication protocol specification Done - Submit PCE architecture specification to the IESG to be considered as Informational RFC Done - Submit first draft of the MIB module for the PCE protocol Done - Submit PCE communication protocol requirements to the IESG to be considered as an Informational RFC Done - Submit PCE discovery protocol extensions specifications to the IESG to be considered as a Proposed Standard Done - Submit PCE communication protocol specification to the IESG to be considered as a Proposed Standard Done - Submit first draft of the PCE P2MP communication requirements Done - Submit first draft of the PCE P2MP PCEP protocol extensions Done - Submit PCE P2MP communication requirements to the IESG to be considered as an Informational RFC Done - Submit PCE P2MP PCEP protocol extensions to the IESG to be considered as an Proposed Standard RFC Done - Submit applicability and metrics documents to the IESG Oct 2011 - Submit WSON requirements to the IESG to be considered as an Informational RFC Dec 2011 - Submit extensions for hierarchical PCE path computation model as WG document Jan 2012 - Submit the PCEP MIB to the IESG to be considered as a Proposed Standard Jan 2012 - Submit P2MP MIB as a WG document Feb 2012 - Submit the discovery MIB to the IESG to be considered as a Proposed Standard Feb 2012 - Submit inter-layer extensions to the IESG to be considered as a Proposed Standard Mar 2012 - Submit inter-area/AS applicability statement to the IESG as an informational RFC Mar 2012 - Submit PCEP extensions for WSON as a WG document Apr 2012 - Submit the GMPLS requirements to the IESG to be considered as an Informational RFC Jun 2012 - Submit PCEP extensions for GMPLS to the IESG to be considered as a Proposed Standard Aug 2012 - Submit PCEP extensions for WSON to the IESG to be considered as a Proposed Standard Oct 2012 - Submit P2MP MIB to the IESG to be considered as a Proposed Standard Feb 2013 - Submit extensions for hierarchical model to the IESG to be considered as a Proposed Standard Mar 2013 - Evaluate WG progress, recharter or close
