The IESG has completed a review of <draft-irtf-rrg-ilnp-adv> consistent with RFC5742. This review is applied to all non-IETF streams. The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'Optional Advanced Deployment Scenarios for ILNP' <draft-irtf-rrg-ilnp-adv-03.txt> as an Experimental RFC. The IESG would also like the IRSG to review the comments in the datatracker (http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-rrg-ilnp-adv/) related to this document and determine whether or not they merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the ballot and the history log. A URL of this Internet Draft is: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-rrg-ilnp-adv/ The process for such documents is described at http://www.rfc-editor.org/indsubs.html Thank you, The IESG Secretary Personnel Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li> is the document shepherd. Stephen Farrell managed the IESG review. IESG Note The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in the LISP and HIP WGs, but this relationship does not prevent publishing. If the authors would like 'em, here are some comments: - This could probably be informational. I only noticed one MUST (in CAPS) on p12, though there some in lower case and some lowercase shoulds. If that MUST from p12 is stated as such in any of the rest of the document set, then I'd say this'd be just fine as informational. If you made that change you could probably make all referencs informative as well and loose the reference to 2119. nits: - last para of section 2 says "in this document" but has a load of references; maybe s/this document/ these documents/ - Title of section 7.2 is oddly indented
