Re: Last Call: <draft-sprecher-mpls-tp-oam-considerations-01.txt> (The Reasons for Selecting a Single Solution for MPLS-TP OAM) to Informational RFC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



All,

I've taken time to re-read this draft over the weekend.

I still think it is well-written and extremely to the point;
it is in the interest of the IETF to publish. I support
publication of the draft.

Admittedly there are some issues around the e.g. the description of the
SDH/SONNET and the standardization of those technologies. Having
been involved in development of equipment that could run both
SDH and SONET, my understanding is that both when it comes to
chips and SW the split, even after the compromise, lead to higher
costs and longer schedules. we would have been in a better shape
with one standard also that time.

Maybe the authors should reflect the facts that Huub correctly point
out in his early mail on this thread, where he describes a situation
that was much worse than what is in the document.

/Loa


On 2011-09-26 12:42, The IESG wrote:

The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
the following document:
- 'The Reasons for Selecting a Single Solution for MPLS-TP OAM'
   <draft-sprecher-mpls-tp-oam-considerations-01.txt>  as an Informational
RFC

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2011-10-24. Exceptionally, comments may be
sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

Abstract

    The MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) is a profile of MPLS technology
    for use in transport network deployments. That is, MPLS-TP is a set
    of functions and features selected from the wider MPLS toolset and
    applied in a consistent way to meet the needs and requirements of
    operators of packet transport networks.

    During the process of development of the profile, additions to the
    MPLS toolset have been made to ensure that the tools available met
    the requirements. These additions were motivated by MPLS-TP, but form
    part of the wider MPLS toolset such that any of them could be used in
    any MPLS deployment.

    One major set of additions provides enhanced support for Operations,
    Administration, and Maintenance (OAM). This enables fault management
    and performance monitoring to the level needed in a transport
    network. Many solutions and protocol extensions have been proposed to
    address these OAM requirements, and this document sets out the
    reasons for selecting a single, coherent set of solutions for
    standardization.


The file can be obtained via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sprecher-mpls-tp-oam-considerations/

IESG discussion can be tracked via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sprecher-mpls-tp-oam-considerations/


No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
_______________________________________________
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce

--


Loa Andersson                         email: loa.andersson@ericsson.com
Sr Strategy and Standards Manager            loa@pi.nu
Ericsson Inc                          phone: +46 10 717 52 13
                                             +46 767 72 92 13
_______________________________________________
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce


[Index of Archives]     [IETF]     [IETF Discussion]     [Linux Kernel]

  Powered by Linux