The IESG has approved the following document: - 'Intermediate System to Intermediate System (IS-IS) Extensions in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) ' <draft-ietf-isis-rfc4205bis-00.txt> as a Proposed Standard This document is the product of the IS-IS for IP Internets Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Ross Callon and David Ward. A URL of this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-isis-rfc4205bis-00.txt Technical Summary This document specifies encoding of extensions to the IS-IS routing protocol in support of Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS). Working Group Summary This is part of a series of seven IS-IS documents that were originally published as informational for historic reasons, that are being upgraded to proposed standard. There is broad consensus in the WG for this upgrade. Document Quality The extensions descrived in this document have been carefully reviewed (including by CCAMP). I am not sure about deployment. Personnel Chris Hopps and Dave Ward have been jointly shepherding this series of seven documents. Ross Callon is the responsible AD. RFC Editor Note Please add a new paragraph at the end of the existing section 5 (security considerations): For a discussion of general security considerations for IS-IS see [RFC3567bis]. All references to [ISIS-3way], which are in fact references to RFC3373, should be changed to instead reference [draft-ietf-isis-rfc3373bis]. All references to [ISIS-RESTART], which are in fact references to RFC3847, should be changed to instead reference [draft-ietf-isis-rfc3847bis]. All references to [ISIS-TE], which are in fact references to RFC3784, should be changed to instead reference [draft-ietf-isis-te-bis]. All references to [ISIS-HMAC], which are in fact references to RFC3567, should be changed to instead reference [draft-ietf-isis-rfc3567bis]. The entry "Updates: 3784bis" in the header of the first page, should instead be updated to reference whichever RFC comes from draft-ietf-isis-te-bis. Note that all of the IS-IS document references above are within a few days of being approved, and thus it makes sense to hold this draft to wait for them to also be published (so that we can reference the actual RFC numbers). _______________________________________________ IETF-Announce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
