This last call technically expires today. Since there were
objections to only holding a two week last call, it won't
be on the IESG agenda before March 8, and comments on
the substance are still most welcome.
I will be asking the IESG to consider whether it should
be published as an ION rather than as an RFC.
Brian (as General AD)
On 2007-02-07 16:20, The IESG wrote:
> The IESG has received a request from the Internet Engineering Steering
> Group (iesg) to consider the following document:
>
> - 'Guidance on Area Director Sponsoring of Documents '
> <draft-iesg-sponsoring-guidelines-01.txt> as an Informational RFC
>
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2007-02-21. Exceptionally,
> comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please
> retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>
> The file can be obtained via
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-iesg-sponsoring-guidelines-01.txt
>
>
> IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=15381&rfc_flag=0
>
_______________________________________________
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
