The IESG has approved the following documents:
- 'Protocol extensions for support of Differentiated-Service-aware MPLS Traffic
Engineering '
<draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-proto-08.txt> as a Proposed Standard
- 'Maximum Allocation Bandwidth Constraints Model for Diff-Serv-aware MPLS
Traffic Engineering '
<draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-mam-04.txt> as an Experimental RFC
- 'Max Allocation with Reservation Bandwidth Constraint Model for MPLS/DiffServ
TE & Performance Comparisons '
<draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-mar-06.txt> as an Experimental RFC
- 'Russian Dolls Bandwidth Constraints Model for Diff-Serv-aware MPLS Traffic
Engineering '
<draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-russian-07.txt> as an Experimental RFC
These documents are products of the Internet Traffic Engineering Working Group.
The IESG contact persons are Bert Wijnen and Alex Zinin.
Technical Summary
The 'Protocol extensions for support of Diff-Serv-aware MPLS Traffic
Engineering' document specifies the protocol extensions for support
of Differentiated-Service-aware MPLS Traffic Engineering (DS-TE).
This includes generalization of the semantic of a number of IGP
extensions already defined for existing MPLS Traffic Engineering in
RFC3630 and RFC-to-be-for 'IS-IS extensions for Traffic Engineering'
as well as additional IGP extensions beyond those. This also
includes extensions to RSVP-TE signaling beyond those already
specified in RFC3209 for existing MPLS Traffic Engineering. These
extensions address the Requirements for DS-TE spelt out in RFC3564.
The 3 Bandwidth Constraint Model documents describe 3 different
experimental models for use with the specified (standards track)
protocol extensions.
Working Group Summary
It took quite some time, but the WG has consensus to publish the
protocol document as a standards track RFC and the 3 Bandwidth
Constraint Model documents as experimental RFCs.
Protocol Quality
These documents have been reviewed for the IESG by Bert Wijnen.
The WG Last Call was also send to the isis, ospf, mpls and ccamp
Working Groups for proper review in those WGs.
RFC-Editor notes:
1. In document <draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-proto-08.txt>
Please move this reference:
[DIFF-ARCH] Blake et al., "An Architecture for Differentiated
Services", RFC2475.
from the normative references section (page 28) into the
informative references section (page 28/29):
2. In document <draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-mar-06.txt>
Sect 10 IANA Considerations Section, pls change:
OLD:
Id for MAR from the range 0-127 (which is to be managed as per the
NEW:
Id for MAR from the range 0-239 (which is to be managed as per the
3. In document <draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-mam-04.txt>
Sect 8 IANA Cosiderations, pls change:
OLD:
Constraints Model Id for MAM from the range 0-127 (which is to be
NEW:
Constraints Model Id for MAM from the range 0-239 (which is to be
4. In document <draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-russian-07.txt>
Sect 9 IANA Cosiderations, pls change:
OLD:
Constraints Model Id for RDM from the range 0-127 (which is to be
NEW:
Constraints Model Id for RDM from the range 0-239 (which is to be
_______________________________________________
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
