On Thu, Oct 31, 2024, at 12:09 AM, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> When two profile handlers don't agree on the current profile it's ambiguous
> what to show to the legacy sysfs interface.
>
> Add a "custom" profile string that userspace will be able to distinguish
> this situation when using the legacy sysfs interface.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/platform_profile.c | 1 +
> include/linux/platform_profile.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/platform_profile.c b/drivers/acpi/platform_profile.c
> index c2bb325ba531c..3128bd16615b6 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/platform_profile.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/platform_profile.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ static const char * const profile_names[] = {
> [PLATFORM_PROFILE_BALANCED] = "balanced",
> [PLATFORM_PROFILE_BALANCED_PERFORMANCE] = "balanced-performance",
> [PLATFORM_PROFILE_PERFORMANCE] = "performance",
> + [PLATFORM_PROFILE_CUSTOM] = "custom",
> };
> static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(profile_names) == PLATFORM_PROFILE_LAST);
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/platform_profile.h b/include/linux/platform_profile.h
> index 6aad98f4abaf4..da009c8a402c9 100644
> --- a/include/linux/platform_profile.h
> +++ b/include/linux/platform_profile.h
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ enum platform_profile_option {
> PLATFORM_PROFILE_BALANCED,
> PLATFORM_PROFILE_BALANCED_PERFORMANCE,
> PLATFORM_PROFILE_PERFORMANCE,
> + PLATFORM_PROFILE_CUSTOM,
> PLATFORM_PROFILE_LAST, /*must always be last */
> };
>
> --
> 2.43.0
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@xxxxxxxxx>
Mark
_______________________________________________
ibm-acpi-devel mailing list
ibm-acpi-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ibm-acpi-devel
