Hi, On 4/21/24 9:11 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 6:45 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Change the default keymap to report the correct keycodes for the volume and >> brightness keys. Reporting key events for these is already filtered out by >> the hotkey_reserved_mask which masks these keys out of hotkey_user_mask at >> initialization time, so there is no need to also map them to KEY_RESERVED. >> >> This avoids users, who want these to be reported, having to also remap >> the keycodes on top of overriding hotkey_user_mask to report these >> and Linux userspace has already been overridding the KEY_RESERVED mappings > > overriding Ack, fixed for v2. > >> with the correct keycodes through udev/hwdb/60-keyboard.hwdb for years now. >> >> Also drop hotkey_unmap() it was only used to dynamically map the brightness >> keys to KEY_RESERVED and after removing that it has no remaining users. > > ... > >> + /* brightness: firmware always reacts to them. >> + * Suppressed by default through hotkey_reserved_mask. >> + */ > >> + /* Thinklight: firmware always react to it. >> + * Suppressed by default through hotkey_reserved_mask. >> + */ > >> /* Volume: firmware always react to it and reprograms >> * the built-in *extra* mixer. Never map it to control >> + * another mixer by default. >> + * Suppressed by default through hotkey_reserved_mask. >> + */ > > Hmm... While at it, can we rectify the block comments to follow the > standard style? > (I meant those which you are touching here.) Ack, but these get moved around in: [PATCH 19/24] platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Switch to using sparse-keymap helpers So to save my self some rebasing pain I will fix up the block comment style there instead in v2 of the series :) Regards, Hans _______________________________________________ ibm-acpi-devel mailing list ibm-acpi-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ibm-acpi-devel
