Re: [PATCH 08/24] platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Move adaptive kbd event handling to tpacpi_driver_event()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Hans,

On Sun, Apr 21, 2024, at 11:45 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Factor out the adaptive kbd non hotkey event handling into
> adaptive_keyboard_change_row() and adaptive_keyboard_s_quickview_row()
> helpers and move the handling of TP_HKEY_EV_DFR_CHANGE_ROW and
> TP_HKEY_EV_DFR_S_QUICKVIEW_ROW to tpacpi_driver_event().
>
> This groups all the handling of hotkey events which do not emit
> a key press event together in tpacpi_driver_event().
>
> This is a preparation patch for moving to sparse-keymaps.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c | 85 +++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c 
> b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
> index 0bbc462d604c..e8d30f4af126 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
> @@ -3677,51 +3677,50 @@ static int adaptive_keyboard_get_next_mode(int 
> mode)
>  	return adaptive_keyboard_modes[i];
>  }
> 
> +static void adaptive_keyboard_change_row(void)
> +{
> +	int mode;
> +
> +	if (adaptive_keyboard_mode_is_saved) {
> +		mode = adaptive_keyboard_prev_mode;
> +		adaptive_keyboard_mode_is_saved = false;
> +	} else {
> +		mode = adaptive_keyboard_get_mode();
> +		if (mode < 0)
> +			return;
> +		mode = adaptive_keyboard_get_next_mode(mode);
> +	}
> +
> +	adaptive_keyboard_set_mode(mode);
> +}
> +
> +static void adaptive_keyboard_s_quickview_row(void)
> +{
> +	int mode = adaptive_keyboard_get_mode();
> +
> +	if (mode < 0)
> +		return;
> +
> +	adaptive_keyboard_prev_mode = mode;
> +	adaptive_keyboard_mode_is_saved = true;
> +
> +	adaptive_keyboard_set_mode(FUNCTION_MODE);
> +}
> +
>  static bool adaptive_keyboard_hotkey_notify_hotkey(const u32 hkey)
>  {
> -	int current_mode = 0;
> -	int new_mode = 0;
> -
> -	switch (hkey) {
> -	case TP_HKEY_EV_DFR_CHANGE_ROW:
> -		if (adaptive_keyboard_mode_is_saved) {
> -			new_mode = adaptive_keyboard_prev_mode;
> -			adaptive_keyboard_mode_is_saved = false;
> -		} else {
> -			current_mode = adaptive_keyboard_get_mode();
> -			if (current_mode < 0)
> -				return false;
> -			new_mode = adaptive_keyboard_get_next_mode(
> -					current_mode);
> -		}
> -
> -		if (adaptive_keyboard_set_mode(new_mode) < 0)
> -			return false;
> -
> +	if (tpacpi_driver_event(hkey))
>  		return true;
> 
> -	case TP_HKEY_EV_DFR_S_QUICKVIEW_ROW:
> -		current_mode = adaptive_keyboard_get_mode();
> -		if (current_mode < 0)
> -			return false;
> -
> -		adaptive_keyboard_prev_mode = current_mode;
> -		adaptive_keyboard_mode_is_saved = true;
> -
> -		if (adaptive_keyboard_set_mode (FUNCTION_MODE) < 0)
> -			return false;
> -		return true;
> -
> -	default:
> -		if (hkey < TP_HKEY_EV_ADAPTIVE_KEY_START ||
> -		    hkey > TP_HKEY_EV_ADAPTIVE_KEY_END) {
> -			pr_info("Unhandled adaptive keyboard key: 0x%x\n", hkey);
> -			return false;
> -		}
> -		tpacpi_input_send_key(hkey - TP_HKEY_EV_ADAPTIVE_KEY_START +
> -				      TP_ACPI_HOTKEYSCAN_ADAPTIVE_START);
> -		return true;
> +	if (hkey < TP_HKEY_EV_ADAPTIVE_KEY_START ||
> +	    hkey > TP_HKEY_EV_ADAPTIVE_KEY_END) {
> +		pr_info("Unhandled adaptive keyboard key: 0x%x\n", hkey);
> +		return false;
>  	}
> +
> +	tpacpi_input_send_key(hkey - TP_HKEY_EV_ADAPTIVE_KEY_START +
> +			      TP_ACPI_HOTKEYSCAN_ADAPTIVE_START);
> +	return true;
>  }
> 
>  static bool hotkey_notify_extended_hotkey(const u32 hkey)
> @@ -11117,6 +11116,12 @@ static bool tpacpi_driver_event(const unsigned 
> int hkey_event)
>  		}
>  		/* Key events are suppressed by default hotkey_user_mask */
>  		return false;
> +	case TP_HKEY_EV_DFR_CHANGE_ROW:
> +		adaptive_keyboard_change_row();
> +		return true;
> +	case TP_HKEY_EV_DFR_S_QUICKVIEW_ROW:
> +		adaptive_keyboard_s_quickview_row();

Was there a reason to get rid of error handling that was previously done with adaptive_keyboard_set_mode and is now not used here?

> +		return true;
>  	case TP_HKEY_EV_THM_CSM_COMPLETED:
>  		lapsensor_refresh();
>  		/* If we are already accessing DYTC then skip dytc update */
> -- 
> 2.44.0

Thanks
Mark


_______________________________________________
ibm-acpi-devel mailing list
ibm-acpi-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ibm-acpi-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Advice]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux