Hi David, On 1/17/22 10:55, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi David, > > On 1/11/22 12:09, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Hi David, >> >> On 1/4/22 04:41, David Dreschner wrote: >>> Hey guys, >>> >>> the attached patch updates the list of whitelisted ThinkPad models with dual fan support. >>> >>> The changes were tested on my ThinkPad T15g Gen 2. According to Lenovo, the BIOS version is the same for the P15 Gen 2 and the P17 Gen 2 ( https://pcsupport.lenovo.com/us/en/downloads/ds551321-bios-update-utility-bootable-cd-for-windows-10-64-bit-thinkpad-p15-gen-2-p17-gen-2-t15g-gen-2 ). >>> >>> I also added the P15v Gen 2 and T15p Gen 2 to the whitelist based on the BIOS version listed on the Lenovo homepage ( https://pcsupport.lenovo.com/us/en/downloads/ds551356-bios-update-utility-bootable-cd-for-windows-10-64-bit-thinkpad-p15v-gen-2-t15p-gen-2 ). The first generation had two fans and where covered by the whitelist entry for the P15 Gen 2. As the second generation has two fans, too, I made that change for completeness. >>> >>> To apply the changes before it's merged in the mainline linux kernel, I made a little dkms patch: https://github.com/dreschner/thinkpad_acpi-dual-fan-patch >> >> Thank you for your patch submission. >> >> If I understand things correctly then you've only tested the addition of the: >> >> TPACPI_Q_LNV3('N', '3', '7', TPACPI_FAN_2CTL), /* P15 / P17 / T15g (2nd gen) */ >> >> quirk, correct? In that case we really only want to add that quirk, we don't >> want to go and add untested quirks. But perhaps Mark from Lenovo can confirm >> that this quirk: >> >> TPACPI_Q_LNV3('N', '3', '8', TPACPI_FAN_2CTL), /* P15v / T15p (2nd gen) */ >> >> also is correct and that those models really have 2 fans, Mark ? >> >> Mark, more in general can you perhaps talk to the firmware team and ask >> if there is a better way to detect if there are 2 fans in a thinkpad then >> maintaining a quirk table for this ? >> >> Besides the issue of the untested quirk, unfortunately your patch is not >> submitted in the right format, so I cannot accept it as is, esp. the >> missing of a Signed-off-by is a blocker. >> >> Kernel patches should be in git format-patch output format and >> your patch is missing a Signed-off-by line in the commit-message. I can only >> accept patches with a Signed-off-by line in the commit-message like this: >> >> Signed-off-by: Your Real Name <email@your.domain> >> >> By adding this line you indicate that you are the author of the code and >> are submitting it under the existing license for the file which you are >> modifying (typically GPL-2.0) or that you have permission from the author >> to submit it under this license. See: >> >> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#sign-your-work-the-developer-s-certificate-of-origin >> >> Given that this patch is trivial and mostly data, not code, I can turn >> it into a proper patch with myself as author, crediting you like this: >> >> Reported-and-tested-by: David Dreschner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> And then merge it with me as the author, or you can resubmit >> it in the proper format if you prefer. > > Despite Mark's answer that he will look into this, it might very well > take quite a while before something comes out of that and it would be > good to in the mean time just extend the quirk list with your > ThinkPad T15g Gen 2 addition. > > So can you please let me know how you want to proceed with this > (see above) ? ping David? Regards, Hans _______________________________________________ ibm-acpi-devel mailing list ibm-acpi-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ibm-acpi-devel
