Hi Thomas, On 2021-11-17 12:57, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > On 2021-11-16 17:56+0100, Thomas Koch wrote: >> thank you very much for working on this. It is high time that we leave >> external kernel modules for ThinkPads behind us. >> >> On 13.11.21 11:42, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> this series adds support for the charge_behaviour property to the power >>> subsystem and thinkpad_acpi driver. >>> >>> As thinkpad_acpi has to use the 'struct power_supply' created by the generic >>> ACPI driver it has to rely on custom sysfs attributes instead of proper >>> power_supply properties to implement this property. >>> >>> Patch 1: Adds the power_supply documentation and basic public API >>> Patch 2: Adds helpers to power_supply core to help drivers implement the >>> charge_behaviour attribute >>> Patch 3: Adds support for force-discharge to thinkpad_acpi. >>> Patch 4: Adds support for inhibit-discharge to thinkpad_acpi. >>> >>> Patch 3 and 4 are largely taken from other patches and adapted to the new API. >>> (Links are in the patch trailer) >>> >>> Ognjen Galic, Nicolo' Piazzalunga, Thomas Koch: >>> >>> Your S-o-b is on the original inhibit_charge and force_discharge patches. >>> I would like to add you as Co-developed-by but to do that it will also require >>> your S-o-b. Could you give your sign-offs for the new patches, so you can be >>> properly attributed? >> S-o-b/Co-developed-by/Tested-by is fine with me. >> >> I tested your patches. >> >> Hardware: >> >> - ThinkPad X220, BAT0 >> - ThinkPad T450s, BAT0+BAT1 >> - ThinkPad X1C6, BAT0 >> >> Test Results: >> >> 1. force-discharge >> >> Everythings works as expected >> - Writing including disengaging w/ "auto" : OK >> - Reading: OK >> >> - Battery discharging: OK >> - Disengaging with "auto": OK >> >> 2. inhibit-charge >> >> Works as expected: >> - Writing: OK >> >> - Disengaging with "auto": OK >> >> >> Discrepancies: >> - Battery charge inhibited: BAT0 OK, BAT1 no effect e.g. continues charging >> - Reading: always returns "auto" > > I tested it on a T460s with two batteries and there inhibit-charge works > fine for both batteries. > What does not work is setting force-discharge for both batteries at the same > time. > This makes somewhat sense as on a physical level probably only one of them can > be used at a time. > > Mark Pearson: Could you confirm that this is the intended behaviour? > Confirmed - only one battery can be used with the BDSS command _______________________________________________ ibm-acpi-devel mailing list ibm-acpi-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ibm-acpi-devel
