On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 13:25:05 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > On Wed 2018-11-28 12:38:19, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 12:18:06 +0100, > > Pali Rohár wrote: > > > > > > On Tuesday 27 November 2018 09:44:18 Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > Looks good... except one detail: you have "tpacpi::micmute" and > > > > "dell::micmute". I know it follows "tradition", but we are trying to > > > > fix that at the moment. Laptop micmute button is a laptop micmute > > > > button, and userspace should not need to know what prefix to use > > > > depending on vendor. > > > > > > > > I'd suggest using "sys::micmute". > > > > > > I can imagine that in future some devices like keyboards would have also > > > mute led. We already have keyboards with mute key, so it is something > > > not unrealistic. What should be name convention for these mute leds? > > > > > > Is not "sys::" prefix too generic? > > > > Good point. I thought of "laptop::" but it's not always laptop. > > "builtin::"? Doesn't sound great, either. > > > > A nice godfather is required here... > > Just use sys:: :-). > > laptop:: would work for me, too. (It is always laptop in the cases we > are handling now, right?) In theory, such a thing can be on all-in-one desktops, too. > When we get a keyboard with mute led, we'll have to decide if it > should be input6::mute -- because it is on keyboard, or if it is > sys::mute -- because the key is expected to mute whole system. OK, I'll wait for more comments in today and update accordingly. thanks, Takashi _______________________________________________ ibm-acpi-devel mailing list ibm-acpi-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ibm-acpi-devel
