On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 6:23 PM, SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in three functions >> >> This one is questionable since it prints error messages at ->init() stage. >> I would rather not touch this. > > Do you find the Linux allocation failure report insufficient in this case? It is up to the current driver maintainer. For me it sounds better to have than not to. >>> Improve a size determination in tpacpi_new_rfkill() >> >> Doesn't make any sense right now. One style over the other. >> Nothing gets better or worth at this point. > > Would you like to care for a bit more compliance with information > from the section “14) Allocating memory” in the document “coding-style.rst”? You know, in Russian we have an adverb: Заставь дурака б-гу молиться, он и лоб расшибёт. Which has English equivalent: Give a man enough rope and he’ll hang himself. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ ibm-acpi-devel mailing list ibm-acpi-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ibm-acpi-devel
