On Sat 2017-12-09 11:29:51, Ognjen Galić wrote: > On 09/12/2017, Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> wrote: > > In newer series (I can't find it at the moment, sorry) > > The new series is a 3-patch patchset that obsoletes this > patch. It is in the testing stage and will be pushed to > the mailing lists and maintainers in a few days. > > > Maybe we should have separate status "not charging due to wear > > control"? > > No, because the ACPI battery driver is a extension to the generic > power supply driver, that does not understand the battery wear control. > Also, Rafael specifically noted NOT to include any thinkpad_acpi-specific > behavior to the generic drivers. Yeah, what I'm saying is that maybe we need to extend generic power supply driver. On small devices, we usually have enough control over hardware to be able to implement "wear control" in kernel. Nokia N900 is an example. "Wear control" is certainly not thinkpad-specific concept. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________ ibm-acpi-devel mailing list ibm-acpi-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ibm-acpi-devel
