On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 1:14 AM, Simranjit Singh <simranjit.singh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Simranjit Singh <simranjit.singh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Using the checkpatch.pl script, there were 8 errors in thinkpad_acpi.c. I fixed them by changing permissions to octal, > and by adding parenthesis. > On the current tree, if you use checkpatch.pl, thinkpad_acpi.c will have 8 errors. With my changes, there are 0 errors. > However, I have added 3 new warnings. > I'm very new to kernel development, so if I messed up somewhere, please do tell me. > > Changed binary permissions to octal in accordance with checkpatch.pl in thinkpad_acpi.c Besides comments you got already, keep in mind that patch numbering starts from 1, 0 is a special dedicated value for cover letter which you apparently miss. Of course, in case of this "series" you are not supposed to make it as a series. And one more time, it's a contributor's responsibility to test (*) changes before sending _by default _. *) sometimes compilation test is enough, though most of the times the real run would be required. As per change 0 to 0444 for the cases you did, you obviously didn't read the code and thus may not understand the ABI of this module. So, obvious NAK for this patch. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ ibm-acpi-devel mailing list ibm-acpi-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ibm-acpi-devel
