Hi, On 01/24/2017 01:32 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > >>>> There might exist users that adjust LED brightness while having >>>> active trigger. The best example is default-on trigger - it sets >>>> brightness only on init, but remains active all the time. Whereas >>>> this could be fixed, there is another case: think of changing blinking >>>> brightness - it would be impossible. >>> >>> I don't see the breakage. For existing blinking and default-on >>> triggers, existing behaviour would be kept. Difference would be that >>> for hardware that changes triggers itself (like the keyboard light) we >>> would present it as a trigger. And you are right -- there would be >>> user visible changes there. You could not assign blinking, because >>> .. it already has a trigger. But I believe it is reasonable. >> >> We've already received negative feedback regarding blocking >> application of different trigger when hw brightness change >> notifications > > Actually sometimes we'll get negative feedback for anything we do. I > still believe exposing the backlight case as a trigger is a right thing. > >> are enabled. One solution to that is making the notifications >> orthogonal to the trigger mechanism. The other possibility is to allow >> for having more than one active trigger for a LED. >> >> We could think of defining a special type of persistent trigger that >> would be always enabled. > > Yes, that could be done. I'd not call it persistent trigger, but > with right name... > > #1: > > Apparently some LEDs change themselves, and we can't find how or > when. That's thinkpad battery LED, for example. > > #2: > > Then there are some LEDs that change themselves, and we can get > notifications. We should make it very clear that we'll not send > notifications kernel did itself. > > So... for #1 and #2 something like > > led/hardware_changes_brightness > > and for #2 > > led/poll_for_hardware_brightness_change > > where poll() wakes the userspace up when the brightness changes, and > read() can get new brightness...? Well, it is almost the same as hw_brightness_change I proposed earlier. Persistent triggers OTOH would be more generic and it would fit for the trigger approach Hans already implemented. -- Best regards, Jacek Anaszewski ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ ibm-acpi-devel mailing list ibm-acpi-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ibm-acpi-devel
