Hi,
On 11/25/2016 12:26 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Friday 25 November 2016 12:14:56 Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 25-11-16 11:01, Pavel Machek wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>>> In view of the above we could report hw brightness changes with
>>>> POLLPRI on brightness file, but unfortunately we can't because it
>>>> is impossible to guarantee that readout of brightness file will
>>>> return the brightness the POLLPRI was meant to notify about.
>>>
>>> Agreed here.
>>>
>>>> That's why a separate read only file seems to be the only proper
>>>> solution.
>>>
>>> Yes please. And lets make self-changing leds into a trigger, as
>>> proposed, and as Hans' patch should be already doing.
>>>
>>>> Moreover, the file should return the brightness from the time
>>>> of last POLLPRI.
>>>
>>> Not sure I agree here. Normally, kernel returns current state for
>>> variables, does not track "old" state.
>>
>> Agreed, storing the last state just unnecessarily complicates things.
>>
>> So do we have a consensus on implementing a new hw_brightness_change
>> sysfs attribute now, which only some LEDs will have, can be polled
>> to detect changed done autonomously by the hardware and returns
>> the current / actual LED brightness when read ?
>>
>> As for the modeling how the hotkey controls the LED as a trigger,
>> although I do like this from one pov, I can see Jacek's point that
>> this is confusing as there really is nothing to configure here,
>> where as normally a user could do "echo none > trigger" to break
>> the link. So I think that is best (cleanest /minimal non confusing
>> API) with just the hw_brightness_change sysfs-attribute and not
>> model this as a trigger.
>
> I can accept with this solution (no trigger, event on new sysfs file
> which returns current/actual brightness state, new sysfs file only for
> devices which can report brightness state).
>
> But I'm not sure if it is really fixing that original problem with high
> power usage...
High power consumption occurred because in that solution every call
to __led_set_brightness{_blocking} triggered the POLLPRI.
In the discussed approach it will not be the case.
> As wrote in some previous emails, consider "actual_brightness" sysfs
> name which is already used for this purpose by backlight subsystem --
> because for consistency. backlight devices have: actual_brightness,
> brightness, max_brightness.
I don't like it very much but I could accept it eventually if
other people deem it accurate.
--
Best regards,
Jacek Anaszewski
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
ibm-acpi-devel mailing list
ibm-acpi-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ibm-acpi-devel
