Re: [PATCH] thinkpad_acpi: support HKEY interface version 0x200

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 14:42 +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Bastien Nocera <hadess@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > 
> > From: Shuduo Sang <shuduo.sang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > The Thinkpad X1 Carbon 2nd generation (2014) ships with BIOS that
> > will
> > return HKEY interface version 0x200. It needs thinkpad-acpi support
> > otherwise it will be routed to wrong branch and the hotkey mask
> > will
> > be wrong.
> > 
> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114731
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Bruce Ma <bruce.ma@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Shuduo Sang <shuduo.sang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c | 35
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> >  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
> > b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
> > index dad2984..c177936 100644
> > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
> > @@ -3357,11 +3357,8 @@ static int __init hotkey_init(struct
> > ibm_init_struct *iibm)
> >  	   A30, R30, R31, T20-22, X20-21, X22-24.  Detected by
> > checking
> >  	   for HKEY interface version 0x100 */
> >  	if (acpi_evalf(hkey_handle, &hkeyv, "MHKV", "qd")) {
> > -		if ((hkeyv >> 8) != 1) {
> > -			pr_err("unknown version of the HKEY
> > interface: 0x%x\n",
> > -			       hkeyv);
> > -			pr_err("please report this to %s\n",
> > TPACPI_MAIL);
> > -		} else {
> > +		switch (hkeyv >> 8) {
> > +		case 1:
> >  			/*
> >  			 * MHKV 0x100 in A31, R40, R40e,
> >  			 * T4x, X31, and later
> > @@ -3381,6 +3378,34 @@ static int __init hotkey_init(struct
> > ibm_init_struct *iibm)
> >  			} else {
> >  				tp_features.hotkey_mask = 1;
> >  			}
> > +			break;
> > +
> > +		case 2:
> > +			/*
> > +			 * MHKV 0x200 in X1
> > +			 */
> > +			vdbg_printk(TPACPI_DBG_INIT |
> > TPACPI_DBG_HKEY,
> > +				"firmware HKEY interface version:
> > 0x%x\n",
> > +				hkeyv);
> > +
> > +			/* Paranoia check AND init hotkey_all_mask
> > */
> > +			if (!acpi_evalf(hkey_handle,
> > &hotkey_all_mask,
> > +					"MHKA", "dd", 1)) {
> > +				pr_err("missing MHKA handler, "
> > +					"please report this to
> > %s\n",
> > +					TPACPI_MAIL);
> > +				/* Fallback: pre-init for
> > FN+F3,F4,F12 */
> > +				hotkey_all_mask = 0x080cU;
> > +			} else {
> > +				tp_features.hotkey_mask = 1;
> > +			}
> > +			break;
> 
> Why do you duplicate this code block with that single byte changed?
> If
> that was intended, then it certainly should be explained.

I didn't, I re-sent one of Shuduo's patches.

In any case, it seems that the patch breaks a few devices that appeared
after the Lenovo Carbon X1 2014. This is discussed, in a few separate
threads, on the ibm-acpi list:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.acpi.ibm-acpi.devel

Cheers

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager
Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of
your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and
reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z
_______________________________________________
ibm-acpi-devel mailing list
ibm-acpi-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ibm-acpi-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Advice]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux