Hi Darren, On Sun, 15 Mar 2015 13:46:12 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The people you will inconvenience more by rebasing are the developers > who write patches that are based on your tree. If you rebase under > them, they may have to rebase and fix up the patches they have already > tested and had reviewed before they can then submit them to you > (hopefully before you rebase again). This, of course, only applied to published trees (which includes anything in linux-next) - what you do in your own (logically private) development tree is your own business. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
pgprTJhfizTWJ.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________ ibm-acpi-devel mailing list ibm-acpi-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ibm-acpi-devel
