On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 03:28:51PM +0200, Luca Capello wrote: > OK, if you want to give a try to my test case: > > $ [install darcs] > $ darcs get http://alioth.debian.org/~gismo/darcs-pull-bug/parenscript.upstream/ > $ darcs get http://alioth.debian.org/~gismo/darcs-pull-bug/parenscript/ > $ cd parenscript > $ darcs pull ../parenscript.upstream/ > [choose to apply only the first patch] > > At that point, darcs takes 100% of the CPU and temperature starts to > rise :-( Hmm.... darcs is not impressing me as a good choice of version control systems. I mean, yes I'm spoiled with git being able to merge hundreds of patches is seconds, but this is rediculous! :-) I've tried running for it for a while, and THM0 and THM1 are in the 80-83 degree range, but it's not going above that. According to THM1 has a passive trip point at 96 degrees, and a critical trip point at 100 degrees, but with your test case I'm not going anywhere near that level. Just for yucks I tried running a second copy of your test case (since I hae a dual-core processor), and with the second core also busy 100%, I was able to drive the temperature up another degree or two, but that was about it. Regards, - Ted ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ ibm-acpi-devel mailing list ibm-acpi-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ibm-acpi-devel
