On ThinkPads where the WLSW switch exists, the firmware or the hardware ANDs the WLSW state with the device-specific switches (WWAN, Bluetooth). It is downright impossible to enable WWAN or Bluetooth when WLSW is blocking the radios. This reality does not necessarily carry over to the WWAN and Bluetooth firmware interfaces, though... so the state thinkpad-acpi was reporting could be incorrect. Tie the three switches in the driver so that we keep their state sane. When WLSL is off, force the other switches to off as well. Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@xxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/misc/thinkpad_acpi.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/misc/thinkpad_acpi.c b/drivers/misc/thinkpad_acpi.c index 743a4d6..202d63e 100644 --- a/drivers/misc/thinkpad_acpi.c +++ b/drivers/misc/thinkpad_acpi.c @@ -2588,6 +2588,10 @@ static int bluetooth_get_radiosw(void) if (!tp_features.bluetooth) return -ENODEV; + /* WLSW overrides bluetooth in firmware/hardware, reflect that */ + if (tp_features.hotkey_wlsw && !hotkey_get_wlsw(&status) && !status) + return 0; + if (!acpi_evalf(hkey_handle, &status, "GBDC", "d")) return -EIO; @@ -2601,6 +2605,12 @@ static int bluetooth_set_radiosw(int radio_on) if (!tp_features.bluetooth) return -ENODEV; + /* WLSW overrides bluetooth in firmware/hardware, but there is no + * reason to risk weird behaviour. */ + if (tp_features.hotkey_wlsw && !hotkey_get_wlsw(&status) && !status + && radio_on) + return -EPERM; + if (!acpi_evalf(hkey_handle, &status, "GBDC", "d")) return -EIO; if (radio_on) @@ -2760,6 +2770,10 @@ static int wan_get_radiosw(void) if (!tp_features.wan) return -ENODEV; + /* WLSW overrides WWAN in firmware/hardware, reflect that */ + if (tp_features.hotkey_wlsw && !hotkey_get_wlsw(&status) && !status) + return 0; + if (!acpi_evalf(hkey_handle, &status, "GWAN", "d")) return -EIO; @@ -2773,6 +2787,12 @@ static int wan_set_radiosw(int radio_on) if (!tp_features.wan) return -ENODEV; + /* WLSW overrides bluetooth in firmware/hardware, but there is no + * reason to risk weird behaviour. */ + if (tp_features.hotkey_wlsw && !hotkey_get_wlsw(&status) && !status + && radio_on) + return -EPERM; + if (!acpi_evalf(hkey_handle, &status, "GWAN", "d")) return -EIO; if (radio_on) -- 1.5.6.2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ ibm-acpi-devel mailing list ibm-acpi-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ibm-acpi-devel
