On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 21:13 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Wed, 03 Oct 2007, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > You found the problem. It is not doing a depth-walk to find LCD0._BCL. I > > shall have it fixed soon, there is a ugly and a nice way to do it. > > Jeez, it took some doing to get it right. Here it is, and this time it > should work just fine. Apply on top of the 0.17-20071002 release without > the other patches. Unfortunately this patch still doesn't work for me :-( Just to be absolutely sure, I added a printk after acpi_walk_namespace, acpi_walk_namespace returns with ACPI_SUCCESS, but it looks like it didn't find BCLL. Argh. > If this works, I only need to find out what the heck is happening on the T60 > (without 16 brightness levels) that gets stuck returning -EINVAL... ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ ibm-acpi-devel mailing list ibm-acpi-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ibm-acpi-devel