On Thu, 04 Oct 2007, Peter Jordan wrote: > Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 10/03/07 23:28: > > On Wed, 03 Oct 2007, Peter Jordan wrote: > >> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 10/03/07 19:57: > >>> However, if you make a valid case for me for the reason you need the > >>> thinkpad-specific 0x5001 and 0x5002 events (and keep in mind that you will > >>> STILL get the generic LID events, which could cause things to be triggered > >>> twice, etc), I can remove the code that filters them out. > >> the problem is, that the generic LID events does not show me if lid has > >> been closed or opened, or am i wrong? > > > > Yes, they do. Look at the information in the event. The events have a > > name, a class (0x80 for this), and some information. > > > > Here are the events in procfs format (what acpid uses): > > > > button/lid LID 00000080 00000001 - lid closed > > button/lid LID 00000080 00000002 - lid opened > > > > hmmm, my acpid log show me that the last number of the event increases > each time I close or open the lid. that makes the differentiation a bit > difficult. I will check that. It is indeed cubersome to need to ask ACPI for the lid switch state than just getting it from the event, but... -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ ibm-acpi-devel mailing list ibm-acpi-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ibm-acpi-devel