On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, Jean Delvare wrote: > > > > Cc: LM Sensors ML <lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > It's pretty pointless to have a mailing list listed here, as the list > > > itself can't ack nor nack your patch. > > > > People in the list certainly can :-) But if you'd rather I cc you directly, > > I will change it. > > Actually you'd rather Cc the hwmon subsystem maintainer, if anyone, and > that's not me. But I was really only commenting on the Cc: in the > header of the patch, not the Cc: when sending the patch. Cc'ing the > lm-sensors list when sending your patch was of course correct. Just > writing it down in the patch header doesn't make sense. That's how I track down whom I need to CC. These patches often sit on my queues for a while before I submit them anywhere, so I'd have to actually place the maintainers *and* the list in the patch headers. The patches are sent in patch sets, and often have different CCs on individual patches. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ ibm-acpi-devel mailing list ibm-acpi-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ibm-acpi-devel
