On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, Theodore Tso wrote: > Henrique, just as a suggestion, but now that thinkpad-acpi isn't part > of the ACPI subdirectories in the kernel source, I'm wondering whether > it might not be better for you to just submit directly to Linus. I'd rather my patches went through a subsystem maintainer, for now. Besides, thinkpad-acpi *really* does almost all of its work through the ACPI subsystem, so there is a benefit from it going through Len... it helps to spot any internal API changes in ACPI that I missed, for example. > Given that your changes are largely localized to the ACPI subtree, it > might make it easier to get fixes in post -rc2 or so. Maybe, but so far that has not been a problem at all... -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ ibm-acpi-devel mailing list ibm-acpi-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ibm-acpi-devel
