On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 02:51:14PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > This patch allows for ibm-acpi to coexist (with diminished > functionality) with other drivers like ACPI_BAY. Given the ACP_IBM_BAY implementation is more complete (or seems to be, please comment if that isn't the case) we should probably actually make sure that is the *preferred* code used (on suitable hardware) at run time surely? That way distributions can build both options and on IBM/Lenovo hardware it will use the IBM ACPI code and otherwise will use the generic ACPI BAY code? Perhaps the IBM_ACPI_BAY code should go away and any missing functionality provided there should be merged into ACPI_BAY? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ ibm-acpi-devel mailing list ibm-acpi-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ibm-acpi-devel
