advice needed for gentoo bug involving lvm2/udev

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



All,

we have the following bug posted in gentoo's bugzilla:

http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=365227.

The reporter is telling me that we should use --action=change instead of
--action=add in the cold boot sequence when dev is devtmpfs. However,
this doesn't seem to be the correct fix based on earlier discussions on
this list.

Does anyone else have any suggestions for fixing this? My thought is
that the rules for lvm2 should be fixed. What does everyone else think?

William

Attachment: pgpV8V0sPLgyc.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux DVB]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [X.org]     [Util Linux NG]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux