At Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:45:52 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Fri, 17.06.11 14:42, Takashi Iwai (tiwai@xxxxxxx) wrote: > > > > If you have the patches ready to convert all drivers which currently can > > > do jack sensing over to the new scheme with control elements, then we > > > should probably focus on that for the future, shouldn't we? > > > > For PA work, I suppose so (although I won't object to someone working > > on the implementation with the present input-jack layer :) > > But you can see David's patch basically independent from PA. > > Well, but I'd guess that the access permissions only really matter for > PA, right? Not really. For example, I was asked about the input-jack stuff by a couple of vendors for their own products, apparently running without PA. > So if we say that proper jack sensing via control elements is > the way to go, then PA should adopt this new scheme and this new scheme > only, and not bother with the input device cruft, and the udev patch > should not be merged either as PA would be its only consumer... I would be against the patch if the change were too intrusive, but this change itself looks small enough to me. The question whether PA should use it or not is a different thing. thanks, Takashi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hotplug" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
