On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 07:49:58AM -0600, Vincent Guittot wrote: > I was just wondering which tracepoints format between my 1st proposal > and yours was the easier to post process by an application like > pytimechart. No idea as pytimechart uses his own ad hoc event parsing. Either way there won't be much differences though. > I have updated the cpu hotplug tracepoint according to your remarks > and steve's ones. I have just replaced the second > cpu_arch_die_start/end in your proposal by cpu_arch_dead_start/endfrq Tracepoints tend to describe actions rather than states, although I can show you some exceptions as well. But this tends to be the major tendency. I suggest you to be stay consistent with this scheme. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hotplug" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
