On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:01:16AM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote: > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 05:16:46PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 17:03:23 -0500 > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 05:16:46PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > Is it really a good idea to have to change every utility that could > > alter network devices? There is iproute2, iputils, tcpdump, wireshark, > > quagga, snmp, ... Many of the utilities come from a BSD world, > > and will be less likely to accept some Linux specific wart. > > I agree, I don't want to have to change all those userspace apps > either. We've started creating patches and are willing to do so if it > will yield the result we want though. > > > I have lost faith in this library wrapper support everywhere method. > > Let's just keep the firmware stuff in udev. If the user wants to > > have a policy that renames device from eth0 to "Embedded BIOS LAN1" then > > do it in udev. Or if you want to keep the ethX naming convention > > and stuff the firmware label into ifAlias or other sysfs field > > so it can be displayed that will be not a big issue. > > 1) we remain constrained to IFNAMSIZ named arguments. There is no > such constraint on BIOS-provided names. Dell BIOS presently uses > 'Embedded NIC 1' which (fortunately) is 14 chars. We're cutting it > awfully close already. I can't dictate to non-Dell BIOS vendors > what to use as their strings, or how long to make them. vlan usage requires 5 characters from IFNAMSIZ (eth0.4095). So my example with 'Embedded NIC 1' plus a vlan doesn't fit. -- Matt Domsch Technology Strategist Dell | Office of the CTO -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hotplug" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
