On 2010-08-02, 11:00 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: > On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 05:43, Yin Kangkai <kangkai.yin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From fd81bea16d3e1e93aebc8cb80ec16ae9c20c6e41 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Yin Kangkai <kangkai.yin@xxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 11:22:49 +0800 > > Subject: [PATCH 2/2] malloc -> calloc and fix some memory leaks. > > > > calloc so that we do not need to memset each of them. > > Any reason to change things to calloc() where no memset() is done or needed? I changed the malloc and memset pair of udev_rules allocation, and for consistence, I finished the others :) Maybe it's only my personal taste that I like to memset memory once I malloc success. If this is not necessary, I can split the patch. Thanks, Kangkai -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hotplug" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
