On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 10:22 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote: > Kay Sievers [2010-03-10 9:34 +0100]: > > utime(): POSIX.1-2008 marks utime() as obsolete. > > That's actually what the manpage says, indeed. However, it contradicts > what's written in the standard: > > http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/sys/time.h.html#tag_13_64 > > says utimes() is obsolete and > > http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/utime.h.html#tag_13_81 > > says nothing about being obsolete. However, this might not be _the_ > POSIX standard? > That's the 2004 version of the standard you're quoting. 2008 changed its mind ;-) http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/utime.html This notes: The utime() function is marked obsolescent. http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/utimes.html This notes: The LEGACY marking is removed. Scott -- Scott James Remnant scott@xxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part