Re: [PATCH] Use utime rather than utimes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 10:22, Martin Pitt <martin.pitt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Kay Sievers [2010-03-10  9:34 +0100]:
>> utime(): POSIX.1-2008 marks utime() as obsolete.
>
> That's actually what the manpage says, indeed. However, it contradicts
> what's written in the standard:
>
>  http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/sys/time.h.html#tag_13_64
>
> says utimes() is obsolete and
>
>  http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/utime.h.html#tag_13_81
>
> says nothing about being obsolete. However, this might not be _the_
> POSIX standard?

Sounds all pretty weird. Maybe we just go for utimensat(AT_FDCWD,
..., if that is in uclibc. Jon, care to check?

Thanks,
Kay
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hotplug" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux DVB]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [X.org]     [Util Linux NG]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux