On Jan 14, Frederic Crozat <fcrozat@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > as part of writing udev rules for Argyllcms supported color measurement > devices, it would be great if udev upstream could merge attached patch > which set ACL on such devices, when detected using Argyllcms own rules. > This is similar to what is done in gphoto2 and other packages and allows > to centralize ACL policy in udev own 70-acl.rules file. I can't see the point. If the device is recognized by rules somewhere else I see no benefits in setting $ACL_MANAGE in a different file. -- ciao, Marco -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hotplug" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
