On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 16:32, Martin Pitt <martin.pitt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Kay Sievers [2009-12-21 16:25 +0100]: >> If it's only about the ACL stuff, we could change the udev-acl logic >> to maintain hidden symlinks in: >> /dev/.udev/acl/c116:32 -> ../../snd/controlC1 >> >> then the udev-acl program would just need to apply the same ACL to all >> nodes found in this directory. :) > > This would be one option. > > I thought about providing a special-case implementation of > udev_enumerate_scan_devices() which fires when there is only a > property match and nothing else. In this case we could just walk > /dev/.udev/db (which we have to do anyway to match the properties) and > skip the /sys walk. This would speedup other applications as well > which search for tagged devices. We do not distinguish at the moment between kernel properties and udev-added properties. This would work only for udev-added stuff, and break things which match on kernel-supplied properties which are imported from the "uevent" file. Kay -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hotplug" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
