This is a follow-up to this mail sent by Kay Sievers [http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.hotplug.devel/14653] which has this statement: "libudev is LGPL, only the daemon and the tools are GPL." I've checked through the headers for the source code in the udev/lib directory for udev-142 source tar file. They are all marked as licensed under the LGPL. However, one file, libudev-device-db-write.c, has a #include "udev.h". The file udev/udev.h is licensed under the GPL. Does this affect Kay's statement that libudev is LGPL? Regards, Kam-Yung -- Soh Kam Yung my Google Reader Shared links: (http://www.google.com/reader/shared/16851815156817689753) my Google Reader Shared SFAS links: (http://www.google.com/reader/shared/user/16851815156817689753/label/sfas) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hotplug" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
