Hi, > > > I assumed that it's guaranteed for there to not be any open fds on the > > > device anymore at unlink() time!? > > > > The entire hardlink thing is purely theoretical and a pretty useless > > exercise because we are on our own filesystem and can not hardlink > > That's not just the "usual configuration"? > > > anywhere else. But I guess, there can not be any assumptions about no > > fds open. > > It just occured to me that it doesn't matter for this anyhow - fchmod() > applies the same checks as chmod(), so anyone (non-privileged and non-root) > who has an open fd can't fchmod() after the chown() to root anymore. any reason for not re-adding the second chmod() yet? Florian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hotplug" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
