Re: make glib optional

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 22.08.09 05:36, Marco d'Itri (md@xxxxxxxx) wrote:

> I do not know how other distributions feel about this, but I fully
> expect to be flamed if I suggested to add 2 MB of glib to the Debian
> base system just to support ConsoleKit's ACLs.

This patch is incredibly ugly, and broken. The most obvious issue is
for example that on Fedora glib is in /lib, and on multilib machines it is
even in /lib64.

If you dislike glib that much then I'd suggest splitting off udev-acl
and the rules files into a seperate package and then have ckit depend
on it. But this explicit check you suggested is just failure.

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering                        Red Hat, Inc.
lennart [at] poettering [dot] net
http://0pointer.net/lennart/           GnuPG 0x1A015CC4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hotplug" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux DVB]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [X.org]     [Util Linux NG]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux