On Sunday March 15, soltys@xxxxxxxx wrote: (sorry for taking nearly a month to reply...) > 1) introduced in commit b822542608326092e177fd1707ca7fb53b2846c4 > > md/array_state in case of partition doesn't exists, so all uevents > for partitions didn't execute any SYMLINK rules Thanks. I've applies this (with a slightly more verbose comment) in the version of the rules file to be released with mdadm-3.0 > > 2) add compat rule, so both MD_DEVNAME (mdadm 3.0) and MD_NAME > (mdadm 2.9.x) can be used I probably don't agree with this. mdadm 2.x created dev files in /dev directly. So it does not expect udev to do anything, particularly with names. mdadm 3.x by contrast doesn't create anything in /dev (if udev seems to be installed) so the rules file must create everything. So I think that 'compat' rule is wrong. I'm happy to listen to more details arguments though. http://neil.brown.name/git?p=mdadm;a=commitdiff;h=fa5090285af9401f950aa5c1a3a82708c69c4906 Thanks, NeilBrown -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hotplug" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html