Re: [PATCH] 64-md-raid.rules fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 01:17, Michal Soltys <soltys@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Few small things:
>
> 1) introduced in commit b822542608326092e177fd1707ca7fb53b2846c4
>
> md/array_state in case of partition doesn't exists, so all uevents
> for partitions didn't execute any further SYMLINK rules

Yep, that needs a fix.

> 2) mdadm exports MD_NAME, not MD_DEVNAME - replaced

It does exist. See here:
  http://neil.brown.name/git?p=mdadm;a=blob;f=Detail.c;hb=mdadm-3.0-devel3#l183

> 3) 0.9x superblocks don't support name at all, but it can be easily
> emulated from kernel name. It simply cuts md and _ in front, and
> p[0-9]* at the end of the kernel name. Following SYMLINK rules need
> no alteration (tests for MD_NAME are superfluous then though). If
> it's really necessary is another thing (and it depends on sh after
> all)

We usually do not want to add new shell scripts for new stuff. It
belongs into mdadm I guess, if we want that.

Thanks,
Kay
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hotplug" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux DVB]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [X.org]     [Util Linux NG]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux