On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 06:12:52 -0200 Piter PUNK <piterpunk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> permissions > >> > >> dri/card* 666 ???!!! > > I think this is overwrited by xorg.conf setting i don't have any > rule changing this permission and ther permissions here are 660: > > crw-rw---- 1 root video 226, 0 2008-12-20 03:33 /dev/dri/card0 > > I guess 660 is the default of Xorg without an Mode directive > in DRI section in xorg.conf. The "video" group here is from > one of few slackware custom rules. (maybe another one that > can vanishes in the air?) Yes, at least one other distribution mentioned a "video" group, so maybe that is a candidate for upstream :) > >> no dialout group? - this may be Debianish, but we rely on > >> it nvram in group kmem not nvram? > > Hmmmm... no dialout and no nvram group here. > nvram really needs an exclusive group? We use uucp in lieu of dialout iirc. Ultimately though, this is easy enough to work around as long as distributions know what the upstream default is *and* that default doesn't change... Re nvram group, I don't see why it shouldn't be root or kmem - is there a legitimate reason why a normal user should have write access to /dev/nvram? -RW
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
